Why the “Crisis of Men” vs. “Women’s Resilience” Debate is Missing the Point

by | Aug 26, 2025 | All, Gender Equality, Women in Entrepreneurship, Women in Leadership

By Helena Demuynck, Transformation Catalyst & Creator of The Boundary Breakers Collective

Last week, a conversation left me quietly unsettled. A fellow advocate for women’s empowerment voiced a perspective I’ve heard before—one that places the weight of progress squarely on women’s shoulders. “We’ve lost our grit,” she argued. “We’ve internalized society’s limits instead of fighting back.” Her words echoed a subtle but pervasive narrative: If women aren’t thriving, it’s because we aren’t trying hard enough.

At the same time, Michelle Weston‘s powerful blog resonated deeply. She named the gaslighting many women feel as the “crisis of men” dominates headlines while female executives still battle for basic recognition. “Inclusion isn’t selective,” she reminds us. Yet the implication lingers: Should women step back so men can catch up?

This is the heart of the divide. One view faults women for not breaking systems. The other faults systems for breaking women.

And here’s what neuroscience tells us about this impossible bind: when our brains are caught in this kind of cognitive dissonance, we default to survival mode rather than growth mode. We’re literally wired to choose sides instead of solutions.

The Three Traps That Keep Us Stuck

The first trap is self-blame, where we tell ourselves “If I were stronger, more resilient, more strategic, I’d succeed.” This completely ignores that these systems were designed before women entered the workforce, creating what researchers call “institutional lag”—our brains and bodies are trying to navigate structures that weren’t built for us.

The second trap flips to systemic blame: “Men hold power; they’re the problem.” While acknowledging systemic barriers is crucial, this overlooks something important—many men are also struggling within these same toxic structures. When we activate our brain’s threat detection system against an entire group, we shut down the very neural pathways needed for collaboration and creative problem-solving.

The third trap is comparison, forcing us to decide whose pain deserves more attention. This creates what I call “scarcity thinking”—the false belief that supporting one group means abandoning another. Neurologically, this triggers our amygdala’s fight-or-flight response, draining energy from the prefrontal cortex where actual solutions live.

The real casualty? Progress itself.

When we fight over who deserves support, we sustain a leadership model that values only half of human potential.

A Way Forward: Human-Centric Leadership

To transcend this stalemate, we need to rewire how we think about leadership itself. This starts with naming the system, not the people. The issue isn’t men or women—it’s outdated leadership archetypes that our brains have been conditioned to accept as “normal.” Qualities like collaboration, intuition, and empathy are still labeled “soft” while decisiveness and competitiveness remain “strong.”

But here’s what’s fascinating: neuroscience shows us that the most effective leaders actually integrate both hemispheres of their brain, accessing both analytical and empathetic capabilities.

We also need to democratize sponsorship. Weston notes that men are often “sponsored into senior roles by default” while women rely on mentorship—advice rather than advocacy. This isn’t just about fairness; it’s about neural pattern recognition. When our brains consistently see certain types of people in power, those patterns become our unconscious blueprint for leadership. We need to train leaders, especially men, to sponsor high-potential women for P&L roles and create cross-gender sponsorship cohorts focused on shared growth.

Perhaps most importantly, we must redefine power beyond control. Current power structures activate our brain’s dominance hierarchies—ancient neural circuits designed for survival, not thriving. Human-centric leadership treats power as collaborative fuel, operating from the truth that “my power grows when I empower others.”

This shifts us from scarcity-based thinking to abundance-based thinking, literally changing our brain chemistry from stress hormones to connection hormones.

Finally, we need to build what I call “And” spaces—forums where women can voice exhaustion without judgment, men can express vulnerability without shame, and both can co-design systemic solutions. These spaces work because they activate our brain’s social bonding networks rather than our threat detection systems.

The Humanity Dividend

When we liberate leadership from gendered constraints, something remarkable happens. Innovation ignites because diverse teams solve problems 50% faster—not because of some feel-good diversity metric, but because cognitive diversity literally creates new neural pathways for problem-solving. Mental health improves as psychological safety replaces burnout, allowing our nervous systems to move from survival mode to growth mode. And legacy changes as young professionals see leadership as inclusive collaboration rather than a zero-sum battleground.

Your Role in This Shift

As leaders and advocates, we must resist either/or narratives. Progress isn’t pie—supporting men doesn’t require silencing women. Our brains are wired for binary thinking as a survival mechanism, but conscious leadership means choosing integration over separation. We need to validate all strengths, recognizing that a negotiator’s resolve and a mediator’s wisdom are equally vital. And we must demand systemic change, because individual resilience alone cannot fix broken systems.

The future of leadership isn’t female or male. It’s human. And that is a revolution worth co-creating—one conversation, one decision, one brave act of integration at a time.

Why I Champion Women Leaders Specifically

While I believe deeply in human-centric leadership, I focus my coaching specifically on women leaders because the data is undeniable: despite representing half the talent pool, women still face unique systemic barriers that require targeted support. It’s not about preferential treatment, it’s about leveling a playing field that was never designed for us. When I work with women leaders, I’m not just coaching individuals; I’m helping rewire the neural patterns of leadership itself. Every woman who steps into her full power while staying authentically human creates new possibilities for everyone.

Ready to Thrive, Not Just Survive?

If you’re a woman leader who’s tired of choosing between being effective and being yourself, who wants to navigate these systems with both strength and authenticity, I invite you to experience what true sponsorship feels like. Let’s have a conversation about how you can thrive in leadership while staying deeply connected to your values and vision. Because the world needs what you have to offer. Not a watered-down version of who you think you should be, but the full, powerful, human leader you already are.

Book a call with me and let’s explore how to transform your leadership journey from surviving the system to reshaping it.

About the Author

I help female executives stop performing leadership and start embodying it. After nearly 20 years coaching women at global corporates, I’ve learned that brilliant women don’t need more strategies—they need to remember their inherent worth and lead from that place.

I work at the intersection of psychology and power, using systemic coaching, neuroscience, and somatic work to help women reclaim their leadership from within instead of constantly proving themselves to systems that weren’t built for them.

Want more insights on authentic female leadership? Subscribe to my Boundary Breakers Newsletter and check out my Women Executive Edge YouTube Channel where I share the real conversations about what it takes to lead as a woman today.

 

 

 

 

The opinions expressed by the authors of videos, academic or non-academic articles, blogs, academic books or essays (“the material”) are those of the author(s); they do not bind the members of the Global Wo.Men Hub, who, among themselves, do not necessarily think in the same way. By sponsoring the publication of this material, the Global Wo.Men Hub believes it contributes to useful social debates. As such, the material may be published in response to others.

 

Shares
Share This